Accountability methodology

What each measure says, and what it does not

There is no composite performance score. Authorities are compared separately on response, resolution, citizen outcomes, backlog, and appeal decisions.

Measure definitions

Method version 1.0.0

response

Time to first response

Median hours from submission to the first recorded officer action.

Better result
Lower value
Ranking threshold
20 observations

resolution

Time to resolution

Median days from submission to a substantive grievance closure.

Better result
Lower value
Ranking threshold
20 observations

citizen outcome

Adjusted citizen rating

Average rating adjusted toward 3.5 out of 5 when an authority has few responses.

Better result
Higher value
Ranking threshold
10 observations

citizen outcome

Average citizen rating

Arithmetic mean of citizen ratings from 1 to 5.

Better result
Higher value
Ranking threshold
10 observations

citizen outcome

Citizens dissatisfied

Share of submitted ratings scored 1 or 2 out of 5.

Better result
Lower value
Ranking threshold
10 observations

citizen outcome

Citizens reporting no resolution

Share of feedback responses where the citizen said the grievance was not resolved.

Better result
Lower value
Ranking threshold
10 observations

backlog

Backlog older than 30 days

Share of open grievances that have remained open for more than 30 days.

Better result
Lower value
Ranking threshold
10 observations

appeals

Original decisions overturned

Share of decided appeals that overturned the original grievance decision.

Better result
Lower value
Ranking threshold
5 observations

Citizen ratings

The arithmetic average and rating spread are published. The ranking measure uses a Bayesian adjustment toward 3.5 out of 5 with a prior weight of 10 responses, so a handful of extreme ratings cannot dominate the table.

Dissatisfaction is the share of ratings scored 1 or 2. It is separate from the citizen’s direct answer about whether the grievance was resolved.

Appeals and citizen resolution

Appeal status tracks the workflow: filed, under review, resolved, or rejected. A resolved appeal also records whether the original decision was upheld, modified, or overturned.

A citizen can mark the result resolved, partially resolved, or not resolved. This assessment remains distinct from both the star rating and the department’s closure status.

Fixed windows

Every result identifies a 30-day, 90-day, or one-year reporting window. Trends compare stored, versioned snapshots.

Evidence before rank

Values remain visible below the sample threshold, but the authority receives no rank for that measure.

No double counting

A public redacted copy does not create another official grievance or increase any denominator.

Open accountability rankings
I can help you file a grievance, navigate UGAAP, and guide you through each step.
Online AI
Checking connection speed...